
4 September 2026

Written By Katja Orel
Lead Editor, UGC Marketing

Fact Checked By Sebastian Novin
Co-Founder & COO, Influee
A collectibles shop pays $0.34 for a click to its site. A dental practice pays $9.78 for a click on a lead form. Both are paying the going rate for Facebook ads.
The headline averages are $0.70 per click for traffic campaigns and $1.92 for leads, with ecommerce brands at $14.19 per 1,000 impressions and $38.19 per purchase. Fine as a reference point, useless as a target.
Below are the real numbers by industry, the six things that push yours up, and the one lever that pulls it back down.

Facebook ads cost $0.70 per click on average for traffic campaigns and $1.92 per click for lead campaigns. Both figures come from October 2025 data across 21 industries, and the spread inside them tells you more than the averages do.
Start with traffic campaigns, where you're paying for a visit to your site.
Average CPC | Average CTR | |
|---|---|---|
Shopping, Collectibles & Gifts | $0.34 | 4.13% |
Sports & Recreation | $0.41 | 2.60% |
Arts & Entertainment | $0.49 | 2.10% |
Travel | $0.51 | 2.76% |
Restaurants & Food | $0.72 | 1.67% |
Beauty & Personal Care | $0.74 | 1.81% |
Business Services | $0.75 | 1.38% |
Animals & Pets | $0.78 | 1.64% |
Automotive (For Sale) | $0.79 | 1.48% |
Health & Fitness | $0.80 | 1.63% |
Automotive (Repair & Service) | $0.81 | 0.80% |
Physicians & Surgeons | $0.82 | 0.83% |
Furniture | $0.85 | 1.39% |
Apparel, Fashion & Jewelry | $0.86 | 1.29% |
Attorneys & Legal Services | $0.86 | 1.76% |
Education & Instruction | $0.86 | 1.45% |
Industrial & Commercial | $0.86 | 1.36% |
Real Estate | $0.91 | 1.68% |
Home & Home Improvement | $0.99 | 1.28% |
Personal Services | $1.00 | 1.70% |
Finance & Insurance | $1.22 | 0.98% |
Source: LocaliQ, October 2025.
Shopping and Collectibles pays $0.34 a click while Finance and Insurance pays $1.22, a 3.6x gap on the same platform for the same action. Benchmark inside your vertical, not against the $0.70 headline.
Lead campaigns are a different auction. You're asking Meta to find people who will fill in a form, and it prices that accordingly.
Cost per lead | Cost per click | |
|---|---|---|
Restaurants & Food | $3.16 | $0.74 |
Real Estate | $16.61 | $1.57 |
Career & Employment | $17.64 | $0.86 |
Arts & Entertainment | $18.17 | $1.08 |
Attorneys & Legal Services | $18.17 | $4.10 |
Sports & Recreation | $19.30 | $1.07 |
Education & Instruction | $28.22 | $1.65 |
Personal Services | $30.57 | $2.08 |
Industrial & Commercial | $37.34 | $1.80 |
Furniture | $40.04 | $2.18 |
Home & Home Improvement | $41.26 | $2.23 |
Physicians & Surgeons | $47.47 | $2.23 |
Beauty & Personal Care | $51.42 | $3.06 |
Health & Fitness | $52.98 | $2.64 |
Dentists & Dental Services | $76.71 | $9.78 |
Source: LocaliQ, October 2025.
Lead campaigns cost more per click than traffic campaigns in every industry that appears in both tables. Meta prices delivery by how valuable the action is, so optimizing for a form fill costs more than optimizing for a visit.
Cost per lead tracks customer value even more closely. A $76.71 dental lead looks brutal next to a $3.16 restaurant lead until you weigh it against what a new patient is worth over five years. Read your CPL against your own customer value, not against other verticals.
For ecommerce the numbers that matter are CPM and CPA. Triple Whale's 2025 data from nearly 35,000 brands puts the median at $14.19 per 1,000 impressions and $38.19 per purchase, with CPA running from $29.99 in Lifestyle and Boutique up to $49.48 in Electronics. The wider Facebook Ads benchmarks picture covers CTR and ROAS alongside those, and the average CPA for Facebook ads breakdown lists every vertical.
One comparison is worth having before you set a budget: Meta is not the cheapest place to buy impressions, and hasn't been for a while.
Average CPM | |
|---|---|
TikTok | $4.67 |
Pinterest | $4.67 |
YouTube | $7.61 |
Meta | $8.17 |
Snapchat | $12.84 |
Source: Gupta Media, October 2025.
Snapchat charges 57% more per 1,000 impressions than Meta. TikTok charges 43% less. Neither number tells you where to spend, because an impression that doesn't convert isn't cheap at any price. Compare platforms on cost per result.


UGC videos starting at £96

20,000+ Vetted Creators in UK
Meta has no minimum spend. You can run a campaign on $5 a day and it will deliver. Your practical minimum is set by the learning phase instead.
Every ad set needs roughly 50 optimization events per week to exit the learning phase and deliver predictably. That gives you a formula you can run in ten seconds:
Expected cost per result × 50 ÷ 7 = minimum daily budget for one ad set.
Minimum daily budget | Roughly per month | |
|---|---|---|
$5 per result (add to cart) | ~$36 | ~$1,080 |
$20 per result (typical lead) | ~$143 | ~$4,290 |
$38 per result (average ecommerce purchase) | ~$271 | ~$8,130 |
Run the number for your own cost per result before you set anything. If the answer is more than you're prepared to spend, that's useful information rather than a reason to spend less and hope.
The most common budget mistake is spreading it too thin. Five ad sets splitting $100 a day all sit in the learning phase indefinitely. One ad set with the full $100 exits learning inside a week and starts optimizing properly. Concentrate first, split later.
If purchase-level budget is out of reach, change the event instead of the budget. In Ads Manager, open the ad set, and under Optimization for ad delivery switch Purchase to Add to cart. Add-to-carts run five to ten times more frequent than purchases in most accounts, so you clear 50 events a week at a fraction of the spend. Give it two weeks to stabilize, then duplicate the ad set and move that copy to Purchase.
Judge the result on revenue, not clicks. A campaign with a strong good CPC number and no sales is buying cheap clicks from people who click a lot and never buy. What tells you the budget is working is a good ROAS figure that holds as you scale.
Raise the budget when that number holds, not when the CPC drops.

Six things push Facebook ad costs up, listed in the order you're most likely to be running into them.
1. Creative fatigue. Frequency climbs, CTR falls, and Meta charges more to deliver the same ad to the same people. This is the most common silent cost driver, and it usually sets in two to three weeks into a winning ad's run.
Watch frequency and CTR together. If frequency is above 3 and CTR is down a third from week one, the creative is finished. That is what ad fatigue Facebook looks like in the numbers, and it costs you before it ever shows up as a CPM problem.
2. Market-wide inflation. Meta CPM rose 20.03% year over year in 2025, and every ecommerce vertical in Triple Whale's data went up. Part of what you're paying is just the market, and no account-level fix touches it.
3. Seasonality. December is the most expensive month of the year on Meta. Gupta Media clocked Cyber Monday 2024 at a $17.70 CPM, 138% above Meta's annualized average. Budget Q4 at Q4 rates and do your creative testing in Q1, when impressions are cheap.
4. Narrow audiences. Small audiences run out of people fast, so frequency climbs and you end up bidding against yourself. Broad targeting with a clean conversion signal usually costs less per result in 2026 than hand-built interest stacks.
5. The wrong objective. Traffic campaigns buy cheap clicks from people who click a lot and rarely buy. Sales campaigns cost more per event and waste far less. If you're judging a Sales campaign by its CPC, it will always look expensive.
6. Your industry floor. Some verticals are simply expensive. A dental practice will never see restaurant CPLs, however good the creative gets. Know your floor before you decide something is broken.

Creative is the only cost lever you fully control, and since Meta rebuilt its retrieval system it's also the biggest one. Andromeda, running across Meta's ad stack since late 2025, decides which ads to even consider for each user based on predicted relevance. Accounts feeding it many distinct variants get more chances to match cheaply. Accounts recycling the same three ads pay the fatigue premium.
Creative volume is a budget line now, not a nice-to-have. Most brands test three to five creatives a month. Accounts that keep their costs down test 10 to 20 or more. Nobody is short of ideas, they're short of finished video.
There are two ways to solve that.
AI-generated creative is fast and cheap per unit, and it fills a testing calendar quickly. Brands running both side by side usually report weaker engagement on fully synthetic variants, because the content reads as produced rather than filmed by a person. AI UGC videos built from real creator footage do not carry that problem, since the person on camera is real and only the hook, language or cut changes.
UGC creator content reads as native, which is what earns the engagement Meta rewards with cheaper impressions. UGC ads win a better auction position at the same bid, and the Andromeda logic multiplies it: 15 creator videos give the system 15 chances to find a cheap match instead of three. Running those variants as Meta Partnership Ads from the creator's own handle puts their engagement history behind the ad too.
The economics work too. Creators typically charge $100 to $250 per video on the open market, and studio production runs $2,000 to $10,000. Neither is what a UGC price on Influee looks like. Full content rights come with every video, so one shoot can be cut into six ad variants without licensing anything twice.

Refresh rate is what separates accounts that track the market from accounts that pay above it. With CPM up 20.03% in 2025, brands refreshing creative monthly absorbed less of that increase than brands that let winners run. Pair new video with new Facebook ad copy rather than dropping fresh footage onto an old hook, because the auction reads the whole ad.
Where this stops working: if your impressions are already cheap and your conversion rate is the problem, more creative won't fix it. Creative volume moves what you pay for attention. It doesn't move a slow landing page or an offer that isn't competitive. Check your good CPM Facebook ads number against the benchmark first, and if it's already in range while sales stay flat, spend the money on the page instead of the footage.


UGC videos starting at £96

20,000+ Vetted Creators in UK
TikTok impressions cost 43% less than Meta's, $4.67 per 1,000 against $8.17 on the same October 2025 dataset. That gap is real and it moved a lot of budget through 2025.
It doesn't settle the question. Meta's conversion tracking and optimization run deeper, so the same impression is more likely to reach someone who actually buys. Set the full TikTok ads cost picture next to Meta on cost per purchase rather than CPM and the gap usually narrows. The TikTok vs Instagram comparison shows the same pattern on audience and format.
There's also an arbitrage inside Meta. Reels inventory runs cheaper than Feed for the same audience, because it's newer and less contested. If you already have vertical video, running Feed-only is leaving money on the table.


UGC videos starting at £96

20,000+ Vetted Creators in UK
The average cost per click on Facebook is $0.70 for traffic campaigns and $1.92 for lead campaigns. Your own number depends on your vertical, which runs from roughly $0.34 in collectibles and gifts to $1.22 in finance and insurance on traffic objectives.
A small business should spend enough for a single ad set to reach 50 optimization events a week, and put the whole budget behind that one ad set. Work backwards from the cheapest event you can optimize for rather than from what you would like to spend.
A sudden CPM jump is diagnosed in Ads Manager in this order. Add the Frequency column and compare it to last week, then check Reach against your audience size, then break the campaign down by placement to see whether delivery shifted to a more expensive surface. If all three look normal, the auction around you got more competitive and nothing in your account changed.
Facebook ads cost considerably more in Q4, and December is the most expensive month of the year. Build the November and December plan on Q4 rates rather than on your spring numbers, or the same budget buys noticeably less reach than you forecast.
Facebook ads cost roughly $1,080 a month at the cheapest usable level, where you are optimizing for an add-to-cart or a similar low-value event. A typical lead campaign needs closer to $4,290 a month, and an ecommerce account optimizing for purchases at the platform average needs about $8,130.
Facebook ads are usually cheaper per click, because Google search clicks come from people already looking to buy. The number that decides it is cost per acquisition, and the winner there depends on whether your product has existing search demand to capture.
Creative quality affects Facebook ad costs through the engagement Meta predicts your ad will earn. A monthly refresh is the cadence that keeps that prediction from decaying, and brands on that cadence absorbed less of 2025's CPM rise than brands that let winning ads run untouched. Refreshing after the numbers slip is already late.
TL;DR
What do Facebook ads cost in 2026: benchmarks by industry
How much should I budget for Facebook ads?
Why are my Facebook ads so expensive?
How to lower your Facebook ads cost: the creative lever
Facebook ads cost vs TikTok ads cost
FAQ

UK
Olivia
Bristol

Ashleigh
Holmfirth

Sara
York

Izzy
London
