
September 2, 2026

Written By Katja Orel
Lead Editor, UGC Marketing

Fact Checked By Sebastian Novin
Co-Founder & COO, Influee
Instagram Feed ads cost $3.35 per click. The same click in Stories costs $1.83.
Both numbers are averages, not prices. What you actually pay depends on where the ad runs, how contested your audience is, how well the creative performs in the auction, and the time of year you're buying in.
This covers what each placement costs, what to budget at every spend level, the six things that push costs up, and the one lever that reliably brings them down.

Instagram ad costs vary by placement more than by any other single factor. The same campaign, the same audience, and the same creative can cost differently depending on whether the ad runs in Feed, Stories, or Reels.
Average CPC | Average CPM | CTR range | |
|---|---|---|---|
Feed | $3.35 | $7.68 | 0.22%–0.88% |
Stories | $1.83 | $6.25 | 0.33%–0.54% |
Source: WebFX Meta benchmarks, 2024–2025 data.
Most brands run Feed by default, and it's the most expensive placement. Square and portrait posts made for the grid work there without extra editing, which is why it's the easy choice.
Stories cost 45% less per click. The catch is the format: Stories fills the whole phone screen, so a square post dropped into it leaves grey bars top and bottom, and people swipe past.
Most benchmark tables leave Reels out. Tinuiti's panel of managed US accounts puts Reels CPM below both Feed and Stories, with Reels taking 26% of Instagram ad impressions in Q3 2025, up from 19% a year earlier.
More advertisers move into Reels every quarter, so that gap will close. It hasn't yet.
The objective you pick in Ads Manager moves CPM further than placement does. A Sales campaign costs several times what an Awareness or Traffic campaign costs on the same platform, which is the pattern behind the good CPM Facebook ads numbers.

How much you have to spend isn't really your decision. Meta sets the minimum.
An ad set leaves the learning phase after 50 optimisation events in seven days. Below that, delivery stays unstable and your cost per result swings week to week for reasons that have nothing to do with your creative.
That gives you the arithmetic:
(target cost per purchase × 50) ÷ 7 = daily budget for one ad set
$300 to $500 a month. One audience, one offer, one creative idea. At around $12 a day, you won't get 50 Purchases in a week unless each one costs under $2, so optimise for something cheaper like Add to Cart and check Purchases later.
$1,000 to $2,000 a month. Two or three audiences with a few creatives in rotation. This is the first level where a test tells you anything, because each version runs long enough for the difference to be real rather than luck.
$5,000 and up. Testing across formats and placements, top to bottom of the funnel. At this level, what holds you back is how fast you can make new videos, not money.
Splitting a small budget across several ad sets is the most common way to waste it. Three ad sets at $5 a day will all stay stuck in learning. One at $15 can get out of it.
Spending more doesn't mean earning more, and what counts as a good ROAS for Facebook ads return changes depending on how much you're spending.

Six things change what you pay, roughly in order of how much control you have over each.
1. Campaign objective. Awareness and Traffic campaigns cost the least per impression because Meta can serve them to almost anyone. Sales campaigns cost the most because the pool of people likely to buy is small and every advertiser in your category wants it.
2. Audience size. Narrow targeting concentrates your bidding on fewer available impressions. Broad targeting with strong creative usually comes out cheaper per result, now that Meta's delivery system does the finding.
3. Creative relevance. Higher CTR lowers your cost per click directly, because the auction rewards ads people engage with. This is the factor you control most, and the one most brands treat as fixed.
4. Placement. Feed is the most expensive per click, Stories cost 45% less, and Reels is cheaper again per thousand impressions. Where the ad runs decides your starting cost, before anything else you change.
5. Season. Q4 CPMs run 25–50% above Q1 for ecommerce audiences, and Black Friday week is the peak inside that peak. Model a November budget on spring numbers, and you'll be short.
6. Landing page. Meta charges for the click, whatever happens next. A slow page, or a headline that doesn't match what the ad promised, shows up in your CPA rather than your CPC.
Reels has the lowest CPM of the Instagram placements, but it only works with full-screen vertical video that has sound. Meta tested this directly. Across 15 split tests running the same Reels campaign, 9:16 video with sound cut cost per result by 34.5% against a still image, at 99.9% confidence.
Same auction, same audience, a third off the cost per result. The only thing that changed was the format of the ad.
Creator video already looks like this. Someone filming vertically on a phone, holding the product, makes something that matches what people scroll past on Reels. A polished brand film cropped to 9:16 doesn't, and it gets less engagement.
You also need enough creator videos to test with. Ten or fifteen a month is realistic at what UGC ads cost to produce, against two or three from a studio shoot, and full content rights come with them, so the same video runs in every placement without a new agreement each time.

Four changes worth making this week:
Reels doesn't suit every product. If someone has to read the specifications or compare two options before spending $400, a video that plays for eight seconds and scrolls away won't do the job. A still image in Feed stays on screen while they read it.
Reels works when people decide quickly.

Full content rights on every video
Boosting a post and running a campaign in Ads Manager go through the same auction, so the benchmarks above apply to both. Boosting just buys from it badly.
When you boost, Meta optimises for likes and comments. You get basic targeting, one video, no custom audiences and no conversion tracking worth the name. The money goes out at the same CPM and buys you engagement you can't sell against.
Ads Manager takes longer to set up and gives you a Sales objective, custom audiences, control over placements, and split testing. You can promote the exact same organic post through it and point it at purchases instead of likes.
So the choice isn't cheap versus expensive. It's the same spend with optimisation or without it. Boosting only makes sense if Ads Manager isn't set up yet and you need something running today.
Per thousand impressions the two platforms almost match: $7.47 on Facebook against $7.68 on Instagram. That's the fair comparison, because both figures cover the whole platform. For reach campaigns, which one you pick barely changes what you pay.
Cost per click is harder to compare. Facebook's $1.06 to $1.72 is an average across all its placements, including cheap ones like Marketplace and Audience Network. Instagram Feed's $3.35 is a single placement, and the most expensive one. Feed is dearer per click, but not by the multiple those two numbers suggest.
Facebook holds a wider CTR range at 0.72% to 1.49%, against 0.22% to 0.88% in Instagram Feed, and the spread by industry is wider still in the Facebook ads benchmarks by vertical.
All of these are annual averages. November costs more than any of them, on both platforms, because the two share one auction.

Unlimited revisions until you're happy
Instagram advertising costs between $1.83 and $3.35 per click depending on the placement, and between $6.25 and $7.68 per thousand impressions. Those are annual averages, so what you pay in any given month depends on the objective, how narrow the audience is, and how well the creative performs.
A realistic monthly Instagram budget starts at $1,000. At $300 to $500 you can run one audience and one offer, but you won't have the volume to tell a winning video from a lucky week. At $5,000 and up the limit becomes how fast you can make new videos.
The minimum daily budget for Instagram ads is your target cost per purchase multiplied by 50, divided by seven. A $30 target needs about $214 a day on a single ad set, and splitting that across three ad sets leaves all three underfunded.
A higher CPC than the benchmark usually comes from the objective you picked, not the platform. Sales campaigns aimed at narrow cold audiences pay a premium, and a weak click-through rate makes it worse, because Meta charges less to deliver ads people click.
Instagram and Facebook cost almost the same per thousand impressions, at $7.68 against $7.47. Per click the two aren't directly comparable, because Facebook's figure averages all its placements while Instagram Feed is the single most expensive one.
Reels has the lowest CPM of the Instagram placements. It only accepts full-screen vertical video with sound, so the lower price is there for brands that film for that format and not for brands cropping a square post.
Creative quality changes what you pay because Meta charges less to deliver ads people click. Meta's own Reels testing measured a third off cost per result purely from swapping a still image for vertical video with sound.
TL;DR
What do Instagram ads cost in 2026?
How much should I budget for Instagram ads?
What factors increase Instagram ad costs?
How to lower your Instagram ad costs
Boosted posts vs Ads Manager
Instagram ads cost vs Facebook ads cost
FAQ

Canada
Tracey
Stoney Creek

Jennifer
Mississauga

Kessa
Kelowna

Lisa
Calgary
