
8 July 2026

Written By Katja Orel
Lead Editor, UGC Marketing

Fact Checked By Sebastian Novin
Co-Founder & COO, Influee
The average CTR for Facebook ads is 1.54% across all industries. On its own, that number is close to meaningless.
A 1.1% CTR is below average for an eCommerce brand. The same 1.1% is above average for a SaaS company. What counts as a good CTR for Facebook ads depends on your vertical, your campaign objective, and where your ads actually show.
Here's the full 2026 breakdown by industry, objective, and placement, plus what your CTR is really telling you about your creative.

That 1.54% is a median, not an average, and the difference matters. A few high-spend accounts with unusually high CTRs would pull a plain average upward, so the median across roughly 1,250 companies is the fairer line to measure against.
Most CTRs sit lower than people expect. About a quarter of advertisers run between 0.51% and 1%, and only the top quartile consistently clears 2%. If your number feels low, it's probably closer to normal than you think.
There are also two versions of the metric, and mixing them up leads to bad conclusions.
Add both columns in Ads Manager so you're never holding your CTR (Link) up against a benchmark that was measured as CTR (All). Compare like with like before you decide anything is broken.

Industry is the first filter for whether your CTR is good. The spread is wide: Arts & Entertainment tops the list at 2.64%, while Healthcare sits at the bottom with 0.73%.
Average CTR | Tier | |
|---|---|---|
Arts & Entertainment | 2.64% | High |
Real Estate | 2.60% | High |
Travel & Hospitality | 2.29% | Above average |
Food & Restaurants | 2.19% | Above average |
Apparel & Footwear | 2.06% | Above average |
Animals & Pets | 1.87% | Average |
eCommerce | 1.75% | Average |
Health & Fitness | 1.61% | Average |
Retail | 1.59% | Average |
SaaS | 1.12% | Below average |
Technology | 1.04% | Below average |
Finance & Insurance | 0.85% | Low |
Healthcare | 0.73% | Low |
Three things stand out in the data.
Consumer-facing verticals dominate. Visual, impulse-friendly categories like arts, real estate, and travel clear 2%. If people can picture themselves using the product, they click.
DTC verticals sit above the median. Food (2.19%) and apparel (2.06%) both beat the 1.54% average. If you're a fashion or food brand under 2%, your benchmark is higher than the headline number suggests.
B2B clusters at the bottom. SaaS (1.12%) and Technology (1.04%) run below average, and that's structural, not a creative failure. Longer consideration cycles mean fewer people click an ad on impulse.
To use the table, find your row and treat that number as your line, not 1.54%. A food brand at 1.7% is underperforming its 2.19% benchmark even though it beats the all-industry median. The headline average will make a weak campaign look fine.
Here's the part most benchmark posts skip. For a DTC brand, a below-benchmark CTR is almost always a creative problem, not a targeting one. If a fashion brand is stuck under 2% on Facebook, the fix is usually the hook, the format, or the audience match, not the campaign settings.

UGC videos starting at A$55

4.000+ Vetted Creators in Australia
Objective moves the benchmark more than industry does. Lead generation campaigns average 2.53% CTR; reach campaigns average 0.87%. Same platform, nearly 3x the difference.
Average CTR | |
|---|---|
Lead Generation | 2.53% |
Traffic / Link Clicks | 1.57% |
Engagement | 1.42% |
Conversions | 1.38% |
Video Views | 1.21% |
Brand Awareness | 0.94% |
Reach | 0.87% |
A few things to pull from that table.
Lead gen sits highest because the offer creates instant intent. A free resource, a quote, or a trial gives people a reason to click right now.
Conversion campaigns (1.38%) get judged unfairly against the 1.54% all-industry average. They're serving a harder objective, so a lower CTR is expected.
A conversion campaign under 1% CTR is a signal, not a verdict. Look at ROAS before you panic. A lower CTR with strong post-click performance is fine.
Placement is the most actionable cut of the data, and the one most brands ignore. Instagram Stories leads at 1.34% CTR, while Right Column trails at 0.41%.
Average CTR | |
|---|---|
Instagram Stories | 1.34% |
Facebook Feed | 1.11% |
Instagram Feed | 1.01% |
Facebook Reels | 0.94% |
Facebook Stories | 0.83% |
Instagram Reels | 0.76% |
Audience Network | 0.58% |
Right Column | 0.41% |
Most brands now run Advantage+ placements, which let Meta spread delivery across every surface automatically. That's usually the right call. The table still matters because it tells you where to concentrate creative effort, not where to switch placements off.
Instagram Stories outperforms Facebook Feed on CTR but carries less traffic. Feed is your volume workhorse; Stories converts attention at a higher rate on fewer impressions. It's not either/or. It's about matching the creative to the surface.
Right Column (0.41%) is a volume filler. Don't optimize for it, and don't judge your overall CTR by it.
The highest-CTR placements, Stories and Reels, are built for vertical, sound-on video, which is exactly where creator-led UGC ads tend to outperform polished brand spots. Mobile follows the same logic: it takes 94–98% of traffic and beats desktop by 33–52%, so creative that isn't built mobile-first will show it in the CTR.

UGC videos starting at A$55

4.000+ Vetted Creators in Australia
CTR is input data, not the answer. It tells you three things about your ad.
Creative relevance. Is your hook stopping the scroll for the right person?
Audience match. Are you showing the ad to people who see themselves in it?
Offer clarity. Does the viewer know what clicking will get them?
What CTR doesn't tell you is whether the click was worth it. A 0.8% CTR with a $3 CPC and a 4% conversion rate beats a 3% CTR with a $1.50 CPC and a 0.5% conversion rate every time. Read CTR next to CPC, conversion rate, and ROAS before you draw conclusions.
A high CTR with no sales usually means the ad promised something the landing page didn't deliver, so diagnosing no conversions Facebook ads starts downstream of the click. If Meta is throttling delivery instead, a low quality ranking Facebook ads score is the more likely culprit. Check the metric that's actually broken before you rebuild the creative.
One caveat on all of these benchmarks: they describe cold prospecting at reasonable spend. Retargeting a warm audience will read far higher, and a $10-a-day budget won't gather enough impressions for the CTR to mean much in the first week. If you're retargeting or running a thin test budget, treat the industry number as a loose reference, not a target.

A below-benchmark CTR for your industry points at the creative first, not the targeting. Three things to check, in order of impact.

1. The hook. The first frame and the first line of primary text do the heavy lifting. If you don't stop the scroll in two seconds, you won't get the click. The strongest hooks open on the problem, the result, or a pattern interrupt, not your logo or a slow brand intro. Something like "I stopped buying [category] after I found this" earns the next three seconds; "Introducing our new collection" doesn't. This is the highest-impact fix on the list.
2. The creative format. Static images underperform video across most DTC verticals on Facebook. Lo-fi, creator-led, sound-on video beats polished brand spots because it reads like content, not an ad. If you're running static, test video first: a talking-head testimonial, an unboxing, or a problem-solution demo shot on a phone. That's the format vertical placements reward, and the one UGC creators are built to deliver.
3. The audience match. A strong hook shown to the wrong people still won't click. Check frequency first: past 3–4, you've worn out the audience, and a rising ad fatigue Facebook signal surfaces in CTR before anything else. Then open your relevance diagnostics in Ads Manager, the quality ranking, engagement rate ranking, and conversion rate ranking. A below-average quality ranking is Meta telling you the creative isn't landing with the audience you picked. When the copy is the weak point, the fundamentals of Facebook ad copy are worth a pass. [BLOG: facebook-ad-copy TBD]


UGC videos starting at A$55

4.000+ Vetted Creators in Australia
A good CTR for Facebook ads beats the average for your industry, which usually means 2% or higher for consumer brands. B2B and SaaS advertisers are doing well closer to 1%, since their audiences click less on impulse.
The average CTR for Facebook ads is 1.54% across all industries. That figure is a median, so it isn't dragged up by a few big-budget accounts with unusually high click rates.
A 1% CTR is fine for Facebook ads in low-click verticals like SaaS, technology, and healthcare. For eCommerce, apparel, or food, 1% sits below the benchmark and usually signals a weak hook or the wrong creative format.
A 2% CTR is good for Facebook ads in nearly every industry. It lands you in the top quartile of advertisers and clears the bar even for high-click categories like travel, real estate, and entertainment.
CTR (All) and CTR (Link) count different clicks. CTR (All) includes every interaction, such as reactions and shares, while CTR (Link) counts only the clicks that reach your site, which is the figure conversion campaigns should track.
Creative affects Facebook ads CTR the most. A scroll-stopping opening frame moves the number more than any targeting change, with placement, objective, and audience match shaping the rest.
TL;DR
What is a good CTR for Facebook ads? The overall benchmark
Facebook ads CTR benchmarks by industry (2026)
CTR by campaign objective: context changes everything
CTR by placement: where your ads actually show
What your CTR is actually telling you
Below benchmark? Start with the creative
FAQ

Australia
Madalyn
Melbourne

Annalise
Hamilton

Isabella
Morrisons

Emily
South Brisbane
